MEASURED 2026-07-21 · 3 MODEL API TEST

GPT Image vs Flux vs Gemini: Product Photography Test

A reproducible product photography comparison using the same ceramic skincare prompt across GPT Image 2, Flux 2 Flex, and Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview.

One API gateway for multiple AI models.

APIMart is a multi-model AI API gateway with an OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Use one account to access supported image models, compare current pricing, and choose a cost-efficient option for each workload.

Create an APIMart account ↗
Browse all comparisons
THREE RAW OUTPUTS

Same fixture.
Measured API result.

One accepted output per model. Cost and latency are copied from the stored run records; this dated snapshot is not a universal ranking.

GPT Image 2 output for GPT Image vs Flux vs Gemini product photography

GPT Image 2

Latency
49.0 s
Reported cost
$0.0085
Attempts
1
Requested size
1024x1024
Flux 2 Flex output for GPT Image vs Flux vs Gemini product photography

Flux 2 Flex

Latency
32.0 s
Reported cost
$0.0700
Attempts
1
Requested size
1024x1024
Gemini 2.5 Flash output for GPT Image vs Flux vs Gemini product photography

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Latency
34.0 s
Reported cost
$0.0125
Attempts
1
Requested size
1024x1024
SHARED PROMPT · ceramic-skincare-hero · 1:1

Reproduce the request.

Editorial product photograph of a matte ceramic skincare bottle on pale limestone, soft north-window light, delicate contact shadow, warm neutral palette, 85mm lens compression, no text, no logo.
OBSERVED FINDING

GPT Image 2 delivered the strongest editorial staging, Flux followed the literal window-light direction most closely, and Gemini produced the cleanest but least distinctive pack shot.

Test date: 2026-07-21. The report uses one accepted output from each API and preserves the original images and JSON run records in GitHub. Availability, behavior, and pricing can change.